Ghost books
Friday, November 2, 2007 at 01:47PM I still can't let go of the ghost theme...
About a month back Maud linked to this Slate article on a 1907 memoir by Edmund Gosse, a memoir that could apparently teach recent memoirists a thing or two. The author of the piece notes that Gosse's memoir is the only of his books that is still in print, and the sadness of this statement, and the fact that I had never before heard of Edmund Gosse, made me think, again, of ghosts.
There is a category of books I think of as "ghost books": books that are still in print, but, for the most part, are not as widely read as they once were. It happens with lesser known foreign authors as the fashion for reading certain authors shifts from continent to continent, but it happens with secondary authors from every continent in every decade.
I have no insight into why one author falls behind the others, why his light fades while her light grows strong; it's a matter of popular taste. What's fascinating to me is that the ones who are still in print obviously have defenders — people who champion them, people who love them, and consider them worthy of dissemination. To prevent them from being lost in the ether.
I've participated to a certain extent with my championing of Louis Bromfield, who was a Pulitzer winner in his day, and quite popular, but whose fanbase today is largely restricted to farmers and Ohioans. Bromfield wouldn't be very popular if all of his books were still in print today, and I'm not even sure sometimes whether I even like his novels. Yet I feel a distinct connection to him which forces me to buy every book I find by him at The Strand. As if by somehow collecting everything he put on paper, I can pull the ghost free from his between-world shackles. (As you may know, this is mostly circumstantial.)
I wonder, though, if we champion ghost books not because they're great, but simply because they're relatively unknown. Like some obscure band you can only buy singles by on 7-inch in the back room of some tiny record shop in Liverpool. We feel hip for knowing the unknown, for having read the rarely read. Not classic, but cult classic.
But then I think about the ghost books I've enjoyed over the past few years, and their greatness is obvious: Bromfield's Pleasant Valley. Bruno Schulz's The Street of Crocodiles. Flann O'Brien's The Third Policeman. Alisdair Gray's Lanark. Shirley Jackson's We Have Always Lived In the Castle*.
Many of these books have been championed by bloggers (or television shows), which renews their popularity momentarily. (Will Novel on Yellow Paper be next? via Pinky's Paperhaus) This select renewed interest, this last glimmer of fading light, is equally sad to me: sometimes it feels as if we're holding on to shadows.
But we are all fleeting, our footprints temporary. Holding on to shadows — the shadows of people or the shadows of books, the great shadows, the BEST shadows — is all we can do.
*The crime of the number of Jackson's books that have been allowed to slip out of print has been better conveyed by Jessa, who introduced me to Ms. Jackson's longer work. I would recommend The Road Through the Wall — oh you frightening, horrid little children.
Louis Bromfield,
books,
nostalgia 
